My 12-year-old precocious son asked me about last night’s election results, just before he went off to school today.
In particular, he asked about my party affiliation. When I was 18, I said, I registered with the Democrats but soon, thereafter, realized that was a mistake.
“Because you thought they were a little nutty,” he asked.
“Maybe,” I replied. “But it didn’t make me run into the arms of the Republican Party either.”
Then I said I’m with the Democrats when they talk about civil and human rights but I’m with the Republicans when they talk about money.
“So, really, I’m more Libertarian,” I said.
What I didn’t tell him – because time was running short – was that I also support same-gender marriage and women’s reproductive rights.
Elections are pictures of a moment in time. People vote for whom they vote for many reasons.
Part of it might be because they read up on the issues, deciding one candidate fits their views better than another. Some of it, as Wall Street Journal op-ed columnist Joseph Epstein[i] suggests, might be due to circumstances few consider – family, parents, siblings, how they were brought up, where they live, what they do, the education they received.
So we might consider – outrageous as it might seem – that we’re all brainwashed or, if you prefer in this digital age, hardwired, for certain beliefs long before we leave the confines of where we grew up.
Matt Miller, a columnist I once syndicated, and a candidate himself recently for U.S. Rep. Henry Waxman’s seat, taught me one of the best lessons about why one politician is elected over another: It’s all in the looks.
Turn down the television’s volume when they’re debating or when their ads appear, he said, and it’ll allow you to better study their facial features and expressions, telling you whether they’re happy or angry.
As I recall, he said, the happy ones tend to hold an advantage. Not always, of course. But often.
So perhaps it was Martha Coakley’s face that led to her second significant defeat in a statewide contest. It’s narrow and constricted, not warm enough to win.
And while you might think that’s sexist, Coakley’s facial disadvantage was the same one that hindered Charlie Baker four years ago when he tried to unseat Gov. Deval Patrick.
I hope the politicians assembling in Washington and the country’s state capitals in January follow the lesson my mother taught me: Hold any political view you want, but, remember, life’s solutions are found in the middle.
As for Matt Miller, unfortunately, he didn’t secure his party’s nomination for Waxman’s seat.
I came to know Matt during my time at Tribune Media Services and always found him to be one of the smartest commentators we syndicated. He’s a centrist Democrat, a former Clinton White House staffer and would have been a solid operator not only for his party but also when it came to working with Republicans.
His defeat sheds light on the kind of politics those elected must hold. It illuminates us.